*He tried to cut corner for asylum but failed – FG
“It is important to note that if an Indian court had granted El-zakzaky asylum or leave to travel to another country, it would have violated the Nigerian court order that granted him permission to travel for medical treatment.”
The Nigerian Government has described self-organised development leading to reparteriation of Leader of terrorist Islamic Movement in Nigeria (IMN), Alhaji Ibrahim El-Zakzaky, from India to Nigeria as unfortunate.
The Federal Ministry of Information, in a statement sent to The DEFENDER and personally signed by its Permanent Secretary, Deaconess Grace Isu Gekpe, made this description in Abuja on Friday.
The government expressed disappointment that El-Zakzaky could attempt to descend so low working to do things which contravene the Court’s permission that allows him to travel to his country of choice, India, for only reason of medical treatment.
The outlawed Shiites’ leader, who has been fully backed by his lawyer, Femi Falana (SAN) and some opposition members in Nigeria, was exposed in his bid to use an Indian court to secure asylum for himself so as to relocate from Nigeria to another country, thereby fleeing justice while standing trial at home.
The PS said: “The Federal Government wishes to inform the public about the latest development in the Ibraheem El-zakzaky medical trip controversies to India. The Government notes with dismay the acts of misconduct exhibited by El-zakzaky that necessitated his repatriation.
“The earlier statement of 14th August 2019 by the Government addressed the issues that would have raised some questions with the latest occurrences and particularly the uncelebrated return of El-zakzaky from India. The public may note that El-Zakzaky’s actions in India demonstrated malicious intents that were capable of embarrassing the Governments of Nigeria and India.
“With total disrespect and complete loss of decorum for international procedures while in India, he initiated contacts with a team of lawyers led by Ali Zia Kabir Chaudary and Gunjan Singh in that country. He also contacted some Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), such as the Islamic Human Rights Commission (IHRC) and other Shiite groups. His aim was to seek asylum and eventually relocate to another country.
“It is important to note that if an Indian court had granted El-zakzaky asylum or leave to travel to another country, it would have violated the Nigerian court order that granted him permission to travel for medical treatment. However, he used the opportunity of being in India to attempt to internationalise his cause by mobilising the Rights groups. Even most unfortunate and rather embarrassing as earlier stated, was his quest to be relocated to a 5-Star hotel to receive visitors instead of being admitted in the hospital as a sick person he claimed to be.
“In spite of his misconduct, El-zakzaky’s spouse went further to antagonize the Indian and Nigerian security agents and accused the latter of killing her children. These acts were aimed at winning international sympathy as well as disparaging the Nigerian Government. Having subordinated the quest for medical treatment to other ulterior motives, it became obvious that El-Zakzaky was focused on realising some sinister motives thus the decision to return him to Nigeria,” she said.
